40th PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION
EDITED HANSARD • NUMBER 082
CONTENTS
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Employment Insurance
Mr. Jean-Claude D'Amours
(Madawaska—Restigouche, Lib.):
Madam Speaker, I am pleased to take part in this adjournment
debate and raise a question I asked on April 1, 2009, several
months ago.
My question followed the disclosure of information about positions
at Service Canada being posted in March 2008 but not filled
yet in March 2009. Service Canada is now in charge of employment
insurance, among other things.
Let us remember that, even if the Conservative government was
denying the existence of the economic crisis at that time, people
in our ridings were suffering. They did not have access to the
employment insurance benefits they were entitled to because
of unacceptable delays.
The Conservatives denied the existence of the crisis, and fathers
and mothers had to pay the price. Let us be realistic. They
are not the only ones paying the price. Their whole family is
paying the price, including their children, along with their
brothers and sisters. One year went by without positions being
filled as they should have been.
Now it is September 16, 2009, and several months have passed
since I asked that question on April 1, but I am still wondering
what the Conservative government has done about it. It boasted
that it was going to inject funds to hire people and speed up
request processing so that unemployed workers could collect
their first employment insurance cheque. Back then, and even
now, workers had to wait more than 55 days to receive their
first benefit cheque, which is totally unacceptable.
Now it is September 16 and we are still wondering where these
people who were supposed to be hired are. Just to clarify, I
am talking about employees in regional Service Canada centres.
I am not talking about Service Canada employees in offices,
call centres or other places where employees never meet clients
face to face.
The fact is that we have to provide a service to our workers,
a service to Canadian citizens. Today, I am still looking for
these new workers in local centres that are supposed to be open
to our citizens every day. We have been waiting for over a year,
and we have often raised the issue of this crisis, but we are
still waiting for these new employees while countless working
families have had to wait two months or more to receive their
first employment insurance cheque.
Last year, the Conservative government said that there was no
crisis. It said that it was going to hire people, but in the
end, it figured that the crisis would pass, that there would
be no need for extra employees and that people would continue
to receive their employment insurance benefits.
Why have we not yet seen concrete results and more workers in
Service Canada centres?
I cannot wait to hear the parliamentary secretary's reply. He
better not make up stories about additional positions being
created in local offices because that is not true. When someone
retires, the position is not filled. And if by chance it is
filled, it goes to a central office. That is not what Canadians
and the citizens in our ridings need. They need concrete results.
I will ask my question once again. Where are the new jobs that
the Conservatives have been promising since 2008?
Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister
of Human Resources and Skills Development and to the Minister
of Labour, CPC):
Madam Speaker, I heard the remarks of the member for Madawaska—Restigouche.
Certainly the government has taken action, and it has done a
number of things in a substantive way and also in a process
way. Our government knows that the global economic recession
is affecting workers across Canada. We have taken significant,
responsible and concrete action to help Canadians through employment
insurance. We have made timely improvements to help Canadians
by providing five extra weeks of benefits, making the EI application
process easier, faster and better for businesses and workers
and increasing opportunities for unemployed Canadians to upgrade
their skills and get back to work.
Canadians are benefiting from these improvements. More than
240,000 Canadians have received additional weeks of benefits
thanks to the five extra weeks of benefits included in Canada's
economic action plan. This is a significant number of Canadians.
Canadians are benefiting from improvements to service delivery.
Between April and July, 756 additional claims processing staff
were hired and an additional 280 agents were hired and trained
to answer calls to help even more Canadians receive their EI
benefits as quickly and efficiently as possible.
Canada's economic action plan also announced the freezing of
the employment insurance premium rate for 2010 at the same level
as 2009 and 2008, the lowest level since 1982. These measures
keep premium rates lower than they would otherwise be.
We are assisting businesses and their workers experiencing temporary
slowdowns through improved and more accessible work-sharing
agreements. More than 165,000 Canadians are benefiting from
work-sharing agreements that are in place with almost 5,800
employers across Canada. It is a very popular program. The uptake
is incredible. We believe it is very important to ensure Canada's
workforce is in a position to get good jobs and to bounce back
from the recession.
The career transition assistance program is a new initiative
that will help an estimated 40,000 long-term workers who need
additional support for retraining to find a new job.
The hon. member needs to get behind these programs. Instead
of carping he should get behind these programs and support and
encourage them to continue going forward.
Through this initiative, we have extended the duration of EI
regular benefits for eligible workers who choose to participate
in longer term training, for up to two years, and we are allowing
earlier access to EI for eligible workers investing in their
training by using all or part of their severance package.
By working with the provinces and the territories through this
and other programs, we are providing Canadians with easier access
to training that is tailored to the needs of the workers in
our country's different regions.
The Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development today
introduced measures to help long-term workers who have lost
their jobs. These measures will help ensure that these long-tenured
workers who have paid into the EI system for years are provided
the help they need while they search for new employment. This
is fair. It is an important step for Canadian workers who have
worked hard, paid their taxes their whole lives and have found
themselves in economic hardship. Surely the member can get behind
and support this.
Our government is focused on what matters most to Canadians,
finding solutions to help long-term workers who have worked
hard and paid into the system for years but are having trouble
finding employment through no fault of their own. We are going
through the process of extending benefits to self-employed Canadians
and getting Canadians back to work through historic investments
in infrastructure and skills training.
It is clear from these and other measures introduced in Canada's
economic action plan that our government is stepping up to the
plate to provide real results for Canadians. The member needs
to get behind that to see all these workers through this difficult
time until the economy turns and they can bounce back into the
mainstream of employment.
Mr. Jean-Claude D'Amours:
Madam Speaker, given that my colleague opposite has broached
two aspects of this matter, I would like to deal with them quickly.
First, although the Conservative government says that it wants
to give workers an additional 20 weeks, why will it not cover
seasonal and construction workers and those working in tourism?
All these workers will not qualify for benefits. And yet, all
these industries are in trouble.
Second, the Parliamentary Secretary mentioned the increase in
employment insurance premiums. He is talking about the current
situation but he dares not mention their hidden agenda: increasing
employment insurance premiums by $13 billion. The reason for
the increase is simple: it is a tax on workers, a tax on unemployment.
That is the reality. While our workers lose their jobs, this
government is announcing that it will impose another tax on
workers, another tax on unemployment. That is unacceptable.
They obviously are heartless and do not care about workers and
their families and all those who lose their jobs.
Mr. Ed Komarnicki:
Madam Speaker, we have come up with a number of programs with
significant benefits. Each and every time a new program comes
up, the hon. member and his party would like yet a different
program or find some fault with it. We are focused on fighting
the recession. The opposition Liberals simply seem to want to
fight the economic recovery.
Recently, they walked away from the table and turned their backs
on unemployed Canadians rather than contributing to the solution.
They have refused to give up their two-month work year. The
Liberal scheme was costed at over $4 billion. That is simply
irresponsible and unaffordable in our current circumstances.
What is more, it is offensive to hard-working Canadians.
The Liberals have said that they will vote against all government
measures, including the extra support for workers who paid into
the system for years, and maternity and parental benefits for
the self-employed. They are voting against the popular home
renovation tax credit. Why? They just want an unnecessary election
that will hurt the economy and unemployed Canadians.
They do not care about helping unemployed Canadians. They care
only about themselves and are totally opportunistic. They ought
to apologize for their leader's actions. No Canadian wants an
election. The Liberals are fixated with it and that is wrong.
TOP