40th PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION
EDITED HANSARD • NUMBER 115
CONTENTS
Monday, November 23, 2009
Conservative Government
Hon. Marlene
Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine, Lib.):
Madam
Speaker, on September 14, 2009, I asked a supplementary question
in this House directed at the Prime Minister, regarding a closed-door
speech he had made and that had been recorded.
In the speech that the Prime Minister gave, he said that “judges
are left-wing ideologues”; he also referred to women fighting
for equality as “left-wing fringe groups”.
During question period, I said that women are not marginal left-wing
groups, and that the judiciary and judicial discretion are very
important.
The Prime Minister in that closed-door speech also made this
point speaking about the Conservative Party, “If we do
not win a majority this country will have a Liberal government
propped up by the socialists and the separatists”.
This is another quote: “This country cannot afford a government
like that. If they force us to the polls, if they get together
and force us to the polls, we have to teach them a lesson”.
This is another quote: “Imagine how many left-wing idealogues
they would be putting in the courts, federal institutions, agencies,
the Senate. I should say, how many more, they would be putting
in.”
This is another quote: “Instead of...subsidizing lawyers
to bring forth court challenges by left-wing fringe groups,
we have been bringing in laws...” and then he goes on
to laud himself and his party.
These so-called fringe groups and left-wing idealogues are people
who brought court challenges based on equality rights and language
rights that are guaranteed under the Canadian Constitution.
One has only to look at the issue of the Montfort Hospital.
Because of the court challenges
program, which was abolished by the Conservative Prime Minister
as one of his first actions after coming into power, the Montfort
Hospital, here in Ontario, is still open.
If we look at the issue of women's equality rights, it is because
there was a court challenges program that an ordinary female
worker who is not unionized but who is suffering gender discrimination
has been able to bring a pressing case before the courts and
has been able to win on that. It is the same thing for the issue
of gay and lesbian rights.
We see a government that closed 12 of the 16 Status of Women
offices on April 1, 2006. There are only four regional offices
now, rather than sixteen. We see a government that has abolished
the court challenges program. Under pressure from ordinary Canadians,
the Conservatives brought in some milquetoast program that is
a faint shadow of the court challenges program.
I would challenge the Prime Minister and the Conservative government
to cease and desist with their ideology, which they use to attack
those who do not agree with them.
Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Parliamentary
Secretary to the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development
and to the Minister of Labour, CPC):
Madam Speaker, in the initial question there was not a lot of
substantive content and some of it was not in the appropriate
context. In trying to make something out of nothing and taking
a position without regard to the big picture in what we have
done as a government there was a lot of bluster there. However,
I would like to clarify some things.
Our Conservative government was elected after Canadians were
fed up with 13 years of arrogance, a culture of entitlement,
the Liberal government in it for itself, not listening to the
Canadian people, nor addressing those needs that they wanted.
The Liberals had a remarkable disdain for Canadian sensibilities
with their sponsorship scandal. I would point out that some
of the moneys taken from Canadians who paid their taxes and
used for purposes that Canadians would not approve of, have
not yet been recovered
The Liberals were soft on crime and corruption, soft on ethics
and respect for Canadians, but hard on law-abiding citizens
and those Canadian men and women in the armed forces who needed
more support, better equipment and more funding.
Canadians elected a Conservative government because they wanted
to. They are happy and pleased with the actions we have taken.
We have taken actions with respect to the economy with our economic
action plan. Canadians support our actions to help unemployed
workers. They support our efforts to help self-employed Canadians.
The Liberal members of her party walked away and turned their
backs on unemployed Canadians and when we finally put forward
legislation to help long tenured workers by extending benefits
from five to twenty weeks, the Liberal members voted against
that provision in order to force an election that no Canadian
wanted. It is an election that no one wants. They wanted it
for themselves and for their own benefit.
I wonder what they might say to the 190,000 Canadians. They
voted against specific benefits in a narrow bill to help long
tenured workers. I do not understand how they would do that.
Canadians support our stronger, more principled foreign policies.
They support our efforts to properly fund and equip our men
and women in uniform. They support our efforts to get tough
on crime and criminals. They appreciate our respect for hard-working,
law-abiding taxpayers.
The actions of the Liberal Party have fallen flat with Canadians.
Canadians are aware that the Liberals want an election only
because of their self-interest and not because of those regular
Canadians who look forward to legislation being passed.
Canadians wanted the Liberal Party to work with our government
to come up with solutions for the unemployed over the summer
but that did not happen. Thankfully, we were able to get other
members of the opposition to support that legislation so we
could get it through.
We are putting forward legislation for the self-employed. I
cannot imagine the Liberal Party voting for that as well. They
are simply out of touch with Canadians and with what Canadians
need.
Our Prime Minister and our Conservative government did not need
to impose any sort of agenda on Canadians. Canadians support
our Prime Minister and they support the direction we are taking.
They support the goods things we are doing.
On this side of the House, we intend to continue to give Canadians
good government that they can support. The evidence is there.
They see that we are in favour of getting things done for everyday
ordinary Canadians, the hard-working Canadians who pay their
taxes and who expect their government to take their interest
into account and not the government's own interest.
Hon. Marlene Jennings:
Madam Speaker, I wonder what the member has to say about his
government attempting to cover up the allegations that Canadian
soldiers handed over Afghan detainees to torture at the hands
of the Afghan authorities.
We had testimony from a reputable diplomat who was promoted
following his experience in Afghanistan. What we have had to
listen to in the House for this past week and a half is the
Minister of National Defence and his lackeys, and that is what
I will call them, trying to smear that diplomat's credibility,
reputation and intelligence. This is from a government that
said that it would protect whistleblowers.
It now has a whistleblower on its hands and what is it doing?
It is attacking that whistleblower. It is trying to smear his
reputation and, in so doing, it is trying to intimidate other
potential witnesses.
Mr. Ed Komarnicki:
Madam Speaker, that member certainly goes wherever she might
want to. She strayed quite far from her original question, so
it is difficult to respond. However, I will say this. We will
stand behind the men and women of our Canadian armed forces
whose job it is to protect us and our society as we know it.
Everyone knows that we are doing the right thing. We are doing
what Canadians think is important. Canadians believe that our
government is on the right track. They support our Prime Minister,
our Conservative government and the direction we are taking.
They do not support the Liberal agenda.
We are interested in an agenda that puts Canadians first, not
the Liberal Party or Liberal members, but Canadians. Our agenda
is responsible, principled, respectful of the hard work of Canadians
and mindful of the proper place of government in their lives.
We are working on things that matter to Canadians, such as getting
tough on crime, a principled foreign policy.
TOP