40th PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION
EDITED HANSARD • NUMBER 052
CONTENTS
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
The Economy
Mr. Jean-Claude D'Amours
(Madawaska—Restigouche, Lib.):
Madam Speaker, I am pleased to rise this evening to
take part in the adjournment debate.
On February 11, 2009, I asked the Minister of Human Resources
and Skills Development a question about the crisis situation
facing people applying for employment insurance.
For several months now, we have known that many Canadians are
experiencing this crisis situation. They are applying for employment
insurance for one reason, and one reason only: they are losing
their jobs. If they had not lost their jobs, they would not
need to apply for EI. They could go on working and receiving
a salary in order to support their families. The reality, however,
is quite the opposite.
Indeed, people are losing their jobs and have had to wait up
to 55 days to receive their first cheque. Not only must the
department have all the necessary information, but the employer
might need more time to provide the employee with the termination
papers. The individual does not receive his or her first cheque
until after that. In some cases, there is a 55-day wait, but
quite often, up to 75 days can go by between when the individual
loses his or job and when he or she receives the first cheque.
Receiving your first cheque 75 days after losing your job must
be very difficult.
Every day, many Canadians tell me that it would be interesting
to see the members of the Conservative government, who do not
understand what it is like, go through the EI application process.
Of course, MPs are not entitled to EI. But if they were to do
so, they would understand the reality facing most Canadian workers
every day.
With a delay of 55 days, how can anyone keep a roof over their
heads? An individual, just like a family, needs a roof over
his head, whether it is an apartment, a room or a house.
In rural areas, people need a means of transportation, such
as a car. They also have to eat. That is the minimum for survival
in this country. In winter, things get worse. They have to pay
astronomical amounts to heat a residence, whether they use heating
oil or electricity.
People have to wait 55 days for their first cheque. That means
that many citizens have lost not only their jobs but also their
accommodation and they can no longer feed themselves or their
families. How do people survive? We want to boost the economy
but how can these people do it if they cannot make purchases?
In reality, these people cannot keep their jobs, which are taken
away from them, nor their homes, because they are evicted for
lack of money. They cannot even buy food. This is not the 1930s,
1940s or 1950s, when we could go to the general store and put
our purchases on account, and then pay for them when we received
a cheque.
The fact is that waiting more than 55 days to receive one's
first employment insurance cheque is unacceptable.
Why will this government not simply make things better so that
people can continue to live with dignity and not be forced to
keep begging for help from the federal government?
Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister
of Human Resources and Skills Development and to the Minister
of Labour, CPC):
Madam Speaker, the remarks of the member for Madawaska—Restigouche
give me an opportunity to detail the many steps that our government
has taken recently to help unemployed Canadians and their families
during this difficult economic slowdown.
Obviously, there can be a number of reasons behind any delay,
but we have taken a number of steps to mitigate delays. Losing
a job is a particularly trying time for anyone. There is no
question or doubt about that. Unfortunately, too many Canadians
are going through that right now. That is why we have taken
action to make sure that we are processing their EI claims just
as fast as we can.
We recognize the increased need for processing capacity and
to that end, we have acted and will continue to act to meet
the needs of Canadians in this regard. To this effect, we have
allocated an additional $60 million for EI processing, including
hiring additional staff in order to ensure Canadians who need
help are getting it as soon as possible.
Beyond this, we have taken many steps to meet the increased
demand. We have hired and trained additional employees and recalled
recent retirees. Call centre agents are working overtime on
a voluntary basis. Hours of services have been extended and
workloads are being shared to accelerate the speed of payment
and to ensure Canadians in all regions receive uniform service.
We are also increasing the automation of the claims process.
Through these measures, we have processed significantly more
claims this year than over the same time last year, and we continue
to take action to meet increasing demand.
Through our economic action plan, we have invested an unprecedented
$8.3 billion in the Canada skills and transition strategy. This
strategy will strengthen the benefits for Canadian workers,
enhance the availability of training and keep EI premium rates
frozen.
Never before has there been such a concerted effort to reach
out and help Canadians. Among our many actions, we have extended
the duration of EI benefits by expanding nationally a pilot
project which already provided five extra weeks of EI benefits
to EI claimants in areas of high unemployment. We have also
increased the maximum duration of EI benefits available under
the EI program from 45 to 50 weeks. Over 400,000 Canadians will
benefit from these measures in the first year alone.
While we are pleased that the unprecedented stimulus measures
we proposed in our economic action plan are now starting to
take effect, we recognize that the challenges faced by those
who have lost their jobs in this difficult time, through no
fault of their own, is something that we need to help them with.
We will continue to monitor the effectiveness of these measures
to make sure that the EI system is working and responding effectively
to the evolving economic circumstances. We will do what we can
to stay with those who need us at this time.
Mr. Jean-Claude D'Amours:
Madam Speaker, it is now May 2009. The crisis did not start
yesterday or the day before. In my riding, the crisis started
over a year ago when pulp and paper mills and sawmills started
closing. That is the reality that people in other parts of the
country have had to deal with. We told the Conservative government
about it, but it was not interested. It probably figured that
it could put its head in the sand for a while, then come up
for air once everything was rosy and the economy was doing just
fine.
The fact is that, in September and October of last year, while
the government was campaigning across the country, everyone
was saying that the crisis was happening, was serious. But the
Prime Minister kept saying that there was no crisis, that the
worst was over and that we would get through it. The truth is
that the warnings came from politicians, citizens and economists.
But the Conservatives would not listen.
Who is responsible for the delays? Why did they not take action—back
when the time was right and when people told them there was
a crisis—to prevent families from suffering every day?
Mr. Ed Komarnicki:
Madam Speaker, we know that it is incredibly hard on families
when even one member of the family loses his or her job. That
is why we have taken the action that we have taken.
I am not sure what the member means, but we have helped around
400,000 people by extending EI benefits by five weeks and ensuring
the duration increases from 45 to 50 weeks. Approximately 190,000
people are affected through skills upgrading and training programs.
EI rates have been frozen and that alone will inject $4.5 billion
of stimulus into the economy. That is a huge amount. This is
taking action.
The member says he does not understand why we have not taken
any action. We have taken a number of significant actions that
will help people during the difficult times in which they find
themselves.
TOP