40th PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION
EDITED HANSARD • NUMBER 063
CONTENTS
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Agriculture and Agri-Food
Hon. Wayne Easter (Malpeque,
Lib.):
Mr. Speaker, on May 6th, my question to the Minister
of Agriculture was quite direct and clear: will the minister
commit today to cash payments to Canadian hog producers so they
can have some financial security? Sadly, the minister's answer
was the usual mishmash of misinformation and hyperbole and of
course no commitment to the ad hoc payments.
Why would Canada's hog producers, who have long opposed ad hoc
payments due to their concern over trade issues, request an
immediate payment of $30 per hog based on 2008 numbers? The
answer is quite simple: it is a matter of economic survival.
This industry is on its knees. We are losing the hog industry
in this country. This is about economic survival, nothing more,
nothing less.
Hog producers are ending up in financial ruin. They have spent
their life doing this work. Generations of hog producers have
done this work. Businesses are destroyed. Lives are ruined.
Their economic future is in tatters because of events beyond
their control, and the Conservative government has failed to
address this economic reality.
Let us take a look at the numbers. In 2009, 8,310 farms reported
having hogs. That is down nearly 30% from 2006. In Canada, 70,000
jobs are a direct result of hog production. Pork exports alone
generate 42,000 jobs, $7.7 billion in economic activity, and
$2.1 billion in wages and salaries. The whole industry is on
the line.
In my province of Prince Edward Island, 80% of the producers
have left, in 18 short months. In the province of Manitoba,
exports of weaner pigs to the United States have come to a halt
because of a labelling law in the United States that is nothing
less than a non-tariff barrier.
Even the American Meat Institute, in testimony last night before
the subcommittee on food safety, confirmed it shares our opinion
that the United States country of origin labelling is a trade
restriction. It agrees with a challenge to the WTO. The government,
I will admit, is moving on that challenge. However, a challenge
to the WTO, even if it gets off the ground, will take years.
By that time our pork industry and its tremendous economic potential
will have been cut in half and the dreams of many will be destroyed.
If the government wants to stand up against the illegal actions
taken by the United States, it would immediately announce funding
requested by producers. It is a justified payment based on the
trade action itself.
Such money, reluctantly requested by Canada's pork industries,
would assist in their survival, but it would also send a message
to the United States that Canada is not going to blatantly stand
by while it performs illegal acts. Canadians are behind our
pork industry. They are willing to put money into it to see
that the industry survives.
I ask the minister again whether he will commit to that money
today.
Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister
of Human Resources and Skills Development and to the Minister
of Labour, CPC):
Mr. Speaker, I would like to restate some facts to deal with
the issues the member has raised.
There is no question the Government of Canada is committed to
supporting the Canadian hog and pork industry as it continues
to face challenges with respect to its competitiveness.
Industry stakeholders understand that competitiveness is key
to the survival of the Canadian hog and pork industry. In response,
the industry, provinces and the Government of Canada are taking
the necessary steps to the adapt to the new market realities
at home and abroad. We are finding new marketing opportunities
around the world to help Canadian farmers weather the storm
and to strengthen export markets.
The Minister of Agriculture continues to promote our safe, top-quality
pork to the many countries around the world. At the Canada-United
States border, our Conservative government continues to defend
the interests of the hog sector by launching a WTO consultation
regarding the country of origin labelling. That was commenced
in April.
Let me address the one point raised by the member opposite regarding
a per head payment.
Let me be clear. Per head payments run a high risk of trade
retaliation, not only against the hog industry, but against
all other livestock and agricultural sectors. Is that what the
member wants? Additionally it would be very counterproductive
to our current COOL challenge.
Instead of such a counterproductive way forward, let me tell
members what we are doing for hog farmers. At home, we are offering
more support than ever for hog farmers. Last spring, we offered
emergency cash advances to livestock producers. Now we are giving
producers an additional 12 to 18 months to repay their advances.
The first $100,000 of each producer's advance will also continue
to be interest-free. It is estimated that only 44% of all hog
producers in Canada have participated in the advance payment
program for the 2008-09 production year. More than $450 million
in advances are eligible for the stay of default.
Given the recent challenges in the hog industry, significant
payments are being made under the business risk management programs,
covering between 60% to 70% of the losses of producers.
These are the facts.
In 2007, $235 million went to hog producers through agri-invest,
$20.8 million, kickstart, $60 million, and agristability, $254
million. Approximately 84% of hog farmers participated in agristability
in 2007. Those are significant figures. In 2008, an estimated
$213 million went to hog producers through agri-invest, $18
million, and agristability, $195.4 million. In 2009, an estimated
$182 million has gone to hog producers through agri-invest,
$19.6 million, and agristability, $162.9 million.
Eligible producers who submitted 2007 agri-invest applications
have access to their benefits and they can now apply for the
2008 agri-invest program.
Further, the Government of Canada is working closely with the
National Pork Value Chain Roundtable to develop and implement
a strategy that addresses the competitiveness issues facing
the industry and to succeed in the future. In support of this
strategy, the Government of Canada is responding to industry
priorities, including market access, market development, innovation
and animal health.
To give Canadian livestock producers even greater access to
global markets, the minister has concluded several successful
trade missions to Asia, South America and the Middle East. These
market access initiatives are reinforced with significant market
development funding directed to the hog and pork industry and
have been further supported through the introduction of the
Canada brand promise for export trade.
I see my time is up.
Hon. Wayne Easter:
Mr. Speaker, on what planet does the government live? The fact
is farmers are going out. He said that he is out of time here
tonight. Pork producers are out of time and the government sits
on its haunches and talks about trade challenges. Trade challenges
will not solve the problems of producers in our country.
He talks about agristability. The fact is hardly any hog producers
this year will qualify for that.
If the government would put money directly out there, that would
add to the trade challenge. It would tell the Americans that
it is high time, that this country will stand up against this
illegal trade action and non-tariff barriers that they put in
place, and then we wait three years to get a ruling at WTO and
elsewhere.
These people need cash. The Americans will win by default if
the government does not step up to the plate and meet the $30
per hog 2008 numbers that the Canada Pork Council has requested.
I call upon the government to just do it, do it now and save
this industry.
Mr. Ed Komarnicki:
Mr. Speaker, the facts are, according to a Statistics Canada
report, released on May 25, farm cash receipts for hog producers
have increased to over 27% in the first quarter of 2009 from
the first quarter 2008. Lower feed, fuel and interest costs
are improving the bottom line for hog producers.
The Government of Canada is working with the sector to address
issues of increased global competition. Through the Canadian
Agriculture and Food International Program, the Government of
Canada has contributed $2 million annually to Canada Pork International
to support the implementation of the sector's export market
development plan.
Markets are being opened up, and that is where we should be
proceeding. Dollars are being spent to ensure that a future
is there for the hog producers. However, having a trade action
is not something we want to encounter in a negative way.
TOP